Responses to Atonement
Homepage ] Up ]      Set Free Table of Contents          What's New

 

Table of Contents

Joey_Zarnsy__8-14-04

 

 


Joey Zarnsy  8-14-04

Subject: Defense of the Attonement
Date: 8/14/2004 4:22:59 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: jzarnsy@hotmail.com
Reply To:
To: JCnot4me@aol.com
 

Mark Smith here}     You know Joey, normally after I paste in a person's email, I add my own comments. But seeing how you've flooded with with inane, unsubstantiated, and undocumented comments on maybe two dozen of my well thought out essays, I'm not even going to WASTE MY TIME on this one. My essay showing the stupidities of your Atonement doctrine still stand, and anyone who reads it knows it.

Ok, just like the last one. I quote your headings and tell you what (if anything) is wrong with it.


Biblegod Hits Thumb With Hammer- Sins Forgiven

It wasn't pain that paid for all sins. The way it works is that all sin was placed upon Jesus while He was on the cross. He willingly, and quite literally became sin, as 2 Corinthians 5:21 says. This is different from being a sinner. Jesus became sin itself. (An short explanation of this is at this site, if you'd care to read more into it.) God then crushed that sin. God basically smote Jesus. The great wrath He had stored up against an eternity's worth of hate, selfishness, and evil, He let loose on Jesus. For that moment in time, the Son was separated from the Father. So Jesus quite literally endured Hell on the cross, as Hell is eternal separation from the Father. God satisfied His perfect justice by doing that. Because of that God now looks at our account (I'm refering to those that have accepted Jesus' gift), and instead of seeing the words, "OUTSTANDING SIN; INSUFFICIENT GOOD WORKS," God sees, "PAID IN FULL."

Also worth mention, in light of that little cartoon, is that each part of the Trinity isn't a separate "god," as you often say. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three beings, that comprise one divine essence. It's kinda hard for our minds to grasp, but, essentially, He's the Three-in-One. Each part has different roles. The Father is the ultimate Judge, Jury, and Executioner of Divine Justice. He authored Creation. The Son carried out Creation (spoke the words), and later was incarnated as a human being, named Jesus, from Nazereth. He is the Messiah, which is the voluntary object of God's wrath for us. The Holy Spirit is, as Jesus describes it to his disciples, the Good Helper. The Holy Spirit resides in our world, in our hearts (again, those that allow it to). It is via the Spirit we are baptized, we are inspired, and we are changed in our hearts, to be more holy.


He Who is Guilty of the Crime Must Do the Time

Here's an example that illustrates it well. Let's say you're a father. You have a little daughter. While playing, and being reckless, she knocks over a lamp and it breaks. She has no money, and cannot replace it. You could spank her, send her to her room, and make her do something to earn the money and replace it, but you're a loving father, and you'd rather not bear to see her punished so. You want to spend time with her, not send her away. You're also just, so you can't just let the lamp remain unreplaced. Someone has to replace the lamp. You offer your daughter the chance to be forgiven for the lamp, if she so chooses. You offer to pay for the lamp yourself, as you have more than enough money to cover the cost, and she doesn't. You tell her, though, that she has to promise to stop being reckless in her playtime. You know she'll break a few more things along the way, but you know that, with your love and help, she'll try her best not to, and she won't intentionally break stuff. You willingly offer all this, and she willingly accepts the offer.

This is much like how the Atonement works. God wants us. He wants us to choose to be with Him, and to love Him. But He knows that we're sinful beings, and that we're too impure to even be in His presence. His perfect justice cannot allow evil to go un-righted. So He's gone ahead and paid the price for us! All we hafta do is say, "Thanks a lot, Jesus. I appreciate what you paid for me [although at times we won't even admit there's a bill to be paid], and I'm willing to follow a path of righteousness for You, and turn away from sin. I will live my life for You, and love You, and others, as You commanded me. I'll tell others of this great offer of Yours." As I noted above, we're PAID IN FULL after we trully say this in our heart. And since we're PAID IN FULL, we can spend all eternity with us. Now, unfortunately, there are those that are too proud and/or stubborn to accept this gift. They try to pay the bill themselves, or they simply refuse to stop racking up the bill. These people are, by their own choice, telling God that they'd rather be apart from Him for eternity. He grants that request. The point is, that if you wanna do the time for your crimes, then by all means go ahead, but don't expect it to be anything less than a living Hell.


Jesus The Perfect Human Died for Sins: Really?

The point when it's said that Jesus lived a perfect life is that he himself deserved no punishment whatsoever. For him to have been a sinner himself would be paying a nickel with a nickel. You can'y pay for sin if you yourself are guilty of sin. Also, although the Atonement was Jesus' primary purpose, he was also to be an example of how to live, and a good moral teacher. He wasn't only a good moral teacher and a good example, but he was those things, on top of being the Messiah.

Anybody who claims Jesus was only half-human is either lying or confused profoundly. Jesus was fully human. I know this math doesn't work very well with us, but he was 100% God, and 100% man. This doesn't seem possible to us, but then again, I'm not divine when I try to add things together, so I'm in no place to say it's impossible. Jesus was perfectly human. He had a head, a face, eyes, nose, a mouth, hands, fingers, and toes, a head of hair, and more than likely, a beard. He ate, he drank, he slept, he coughed, he got tired, he could bleed (as he did at his most important hour), and yes, he even went to the bathroom. He laughed, he cried, he yawned, he screamed. He loved, he became angry, he forgave, he rebuked, and he thought. He was a walking, talking human being. We know, from both Christian and non-Christian sources, that this man existed, adn that he died. Does his birth and death not prove his humanity?

In regard to the whole "God raped Mary" thing, and how Jesus was only 1/4th human... Think of what causes life to happen. God. (I know you do not believe this, but I'd rather not make this a creation-evolution debate. I'll just ask you if you happen to know of anything else that could create everything from nothing.) God can create a universe from absolutely nothing. Nothing- what rocks dream about. If He can do that, I think He can make a person without sex being involved (i.e., making Adam from dust). For all we know, God used DNA, just like any other birth, except this DNA didn't belong to any man alive. I don't really know. If at all possible, maybe when He comes back, you could ask Jesus for a blood sample and a microscope before He commences with Judgment Day. Rape is forcing yourself sexually on another against their will. God didn't have sex with Mary. He gave her the gift of a baby son (not just any son, but THE Son). In that time and culture, it was a great thing to have a son. A woman was seen as almost worthless (even more so than normal) if she didn't/couldn't produce an heir for her husband. God gave her something she was more than happy to acquire, and even let her have a part in the salvation of the world. She's even called (although I personally don't agree with it) the Mother of God. I get the feeling that she was every bit consentual. And besides, I doubt God would choose a woman that wasn't up to it. He doesn't override free will, remember? Your logic treats God as though He was subject to the laws of nature, rather than the Creator of nature, itself.


A Savior on Steroids?

Again, Jesus was 100% human, and he had a free will. And there is plenty of evidence in Scripture to show that when Jesus was on earth, He didn't have all the power of God at his disposal. He had some, yes, but not all. He didn't have all knowledge while on earth, as he himself admits that even he doesn't know the hour he's coming back. He didn't have all power, since it was said he couldn't perform miracles in his own country. God limited His own power when He became Jesus of Nazereth. He had no "unfair advantage." He did make better choices, though. He had more knowledge and power than any other, but still those people had enough opportunity to do good, instead of evil. So maybe, someone else could have done it, but I doubt it. I'll be honest and admit that if I could walk on water, or call forth an entire legion of angels, I'd be all over that opportunity on my campus. I prolly would use it for personal gain, not to help others and eventually bring about my own crucifixtion, salvation of the world being needed or not.


A Sinless Human Had to Die to Pay off Debt of Sin?

Answered by my response to previous parts. Jesus' body wasn't literally the price paid. The blood itself didn't do it. The act by which the blood was spilled was the act what God used to do it. The mere act of death wasn't it. It was His death and resurrection. He conquered sin with his death, and conquered death by his resurrection.

The Atonement Makes Sense?

As I illustrated earlier, yes, it does. Your view of God seems pretty warped. I'd advise reading the Bible. I think my responses so far in this email, and in all of my others, you'll find reasons why your definition of God is off. The rules God defined aren't just for His entertainment. They're for our own good. Every sin not only hurts God, but hurts us, and lessens the quality of our own lives. Premarital sex is sinful, and it also hurts us. God made sex, so He knows the best way to use it. He tells us that it's best when in a lifetime relationship with our (opposite-sex) partner. Broken homes are the result of marriage and sex not being treated like they should be.

The Death of Jesus

Ummm, this paragraph is purely unsupported. Read the Old Testament, especially Psalm 22 or Isaiah 53. It was in God's plan all along. Jesus kept telling them even, that he'd die and rise again, and that it had to happen.

Death of Jesus A Waste

I really don't consider the act that brough about the opportunity for all mankind to live in eternal happiness to be a waste... Yes, Jesus forgave sins during his life, but what about those that had already been dead, and those who were yet to be born? You have to realize that although we may be able to think of other alternatives to the way God does things, His superiority of knowledge and wisdom compared to ours means we just hafta trust that His way is the best method. If it got the job done, why question it?

You kinda get a little repetetive in the next paragraph, but the same applies to that one, too.

Jesus Paid The Price?

The site I linked to in the beginning of this email explains that Jesus paid a different price than we would, if we end up paying. Sinners suffer hell. Jesus literally became sin itself. There's a difference, so there's a difference in the penalty. Also, you need to realize that God knew what He was doing when He did it. It's not like there was a chance He'd do it, and then say, "What th- How'd My Son become full of all that sin?" God knew what He was doing, and He knew how to make it work. He did exactly what He felt would make it work best for what His purpose was.



All in all, I noticed you seem to have a major problem grasping the concept of the Atonement. I hope it's just because you've never been exposed to the truth about it, and how it actually works. I hope then, that you're much more educated about it.

Oh, and one more thing, about the innocent suffering for the guilty. It's similar to giving money or food to the needy. You give freely, right? You don't expect the bum on the street to give you back your $5 later, do you? How about when homeless shelters give them food, drink, and shelter? How about buying stuff for poor families? In order for these to be good deeds, we cannot expect repayment. Does this make it wrong, since it's not the giver's fault that the guy is homeless and poor, or that the kids don't have a lot, is it? So (by your logic) the giver shouldn't be giving? Are they being evil? No, of course not. Every good deed requires a do-er, and a recipient. In the case of Atonement, we're the recipients. God is willingly giving, just like we can willingly give $5 or food to people, and do something good. Your logic with it being wrong for the innocent to WILLINGLY suffer for the guilty, is just plain wrong.

I leave you in peace again, buddy. I'm anxious to read any responses you may have to this, or to my other (what is it, eight now?) responses to subjects on your site. I pray that you're beginning to realize that Jesus sets you free, and you need not (and want not) to be "set free" from Jesus. God is with you, my friend.


 


 

 

 
Contact Information for Mark Smith

Set Free!  Orange County, CA

Email:     JCnot4me  @  aol.com        Web Page     JCnot4me.com

NOTICE:  Any and all emails sent to SET FREE become the property of SET FREE to be used or displayed upon the web site of SET FREE however SET FREE decides, but don't worry,  your email address will probably be deleted.   Views contained in SET FREE represent the views of the authors. No implicit approval by SET FREE is to be assumed.