Table of Contents

The Bible:  Worthy of Your Trust?

Eyewitness Testimony Invalidated

     Responses to Eyewitness Testimony Invalidated

God Is Not The Author

History or HIS-STORY?

How Firm A Foundation... of Forgeries???

James the Brother of Jesus

Schizophrenia and Personal Revelations

     Responses to Schizophrenia

The God of The Bible

Biblegod Is Not Perfect

    Responses to Biblegod Not Perfect

Biblegod The Warcriminal

    Responses to Biblegod
The Warcriminal

Tyrannosaurus Pettius Rex

Jehovah Unmasked

In or Out or Neit

Acts of God

September 11th Biblegod Did Nothing

    Responses to September 11th

The God of The Bible:
Does He Exist?

E=MC Disproves God

    Responses to E=MC

How To Prove The Existence of God

    Responses to How To Prove The Existence of God

Shopping For A God

Transcendental La La Land

Caught in a Lie:  Contradictions Within The Bible

Don't Be Such A Cretan

The Genealogy of Jesus

Galilee vs Jerusalem

Matthew vs John

Intrinsic Contradictions

Splainin To Do

The Intercontinental Ballistic Jesus

The Sign on The Cross

     Responses to The Sign on The Cross

Sand, Not Rock:  What Christianity is Really Built Upon

The Atonement

Monotheism Not Biblical

The Ten Commandments

Christianity Has Pagan DNA


Misc. Topics & Thoughts

Jesus:  False Prophet?

False Prophet- Liar, Fraud!

 If Anybody Else But Jesus…

 Jesus and His Expired Prophecies

Matthew 24 Verse by Verse

Mt 24:34 What The Scholars Say

Significance of Jesus Being a False Prophet


     Responses to Jesus The False Prophet

Jesus:  Resurrected?

Even If True

Evidence That Doesn't Demand a Verdict

The Roman Soldiers: "We Were There!"

     Responses to Roman Soldiers

Churchianity Examined

Connecting The Dots

The Authority Totem

Twenty Percent Fewer Errors

Fire The Clergy

     Responses to Fire The Clergy

The Wealth of Churches

Authority In Church Government

The Fleecing of The Flock

The Great Commission Does Not Apply

CAUTIONChristianity May Be Hazardous to Your Health

Victims of Religion

   Responses to Victims of Religion

Voices In Our Head


   Responses to Brainwashing

We Love Our Lies

Christian Morality or Lack Thereof 

Christianity Doesn't Work as Advertised

Hypocrisy- Thy Name is Christian


The Gospel of Jesus

 Happy Father's Day

He Wasn't a REAL Christian

Evangelical Atheism

Free JCnot4me Business Cards
JCnot4me Business Cards- FREE!

Without A Leg To Stand On (A Message For Freethinkers)

Give To Him That Asks

   Responses to Give To Him That Asks

Just Say No

   Responses to Just Say No

Damn The Truth- Full Speed Ahead

Answering Christian Stock Arguments

Modern Miracle Workers

Atheists In America

Anti-Religious Songs

Do Unto Others

Kissing Hank's Ass

Why Beer Is Better Than Jesus

Poster: Jesus is a Liar & Lunatic

The Good News of Atheism

The Skeptic’s Prayer

What Would Jesus Do?

Christian Cults

Consumers Guide to Religion- John Cleese of Monty Python (audio file)

Geek Speak Like a Fundy

   Responses to Geek Speak 101

How To Be a Fundy


Baptists} Once Saved, Always Saved: Always False

Catholics: Only Child or Eldest Brother

Church of Christ

   Responses to Church of Christ Essays

Dr. Robert Schuller: Racism By A Nose

Jehovah Witnesses

Nazarenes} Entire Sanctification = Entire Nonsense

   Responses to Entire Sactification


Seventh Day Adventists

For Christians...

Message to Christian Apologists

Notes to Christians Battling Atheists

Move A Mountain


Ex-Christians Get No Respect


Hellfire For Homosexuals and Roses

Creationism, aka Intelligent Design

The Universe According To The Bible

   Responses to The Universe

In The Beginning God Was Nuts

Intelligent Design


Legalize Prostitution

Its The Economy, Stupid

Illegal Immigration

Bush Is Outta Here!!!

The Bush Monkey

Twilights Last Gleaming

Contra Craig
    (Dr. William Lane Craig)

Contra Craig

   Responses to Contra Craig



   Responses To Editorials

Comments to JCnot4me- Pro + Con

One Picture is Worth...

Links- Other Websites Worth Checking Out

Books You Should Read   

Jehovah Unmasked cover
Jehovah Unmasked

Ha Ha Ha

Christian Election Poster

Flying Spaghetti Monster

Invitation from Rev. Jim Jones



Songs and Poems



Table of Contents


M Landen 3-11-03

hatfield 8-11-03

Roy from New Zealand 12-5-03

Bobby 12-27-03

Wild01Cat 1-1-04






















From:  Andy

Dear Set Free:

I found your article on the internet and was intrigued.  I am a Nazarene, and have been all my life, however that did not make me a Christian.  I accepted Christ at 18 and have been living with Him ever since.  I'm not writing you to argue the point of entire sanctification with you, I would never do that.  I just find your view point interesting.  Just a though, maybe you should study the doctrine ( look it up in the Manual for the CON -- article of faith #10) and you will see that it is not even close to what you have perceived it to be.

Mark here}     So, when in my online essay I quote from Beacon Hill  and Nazarene Publishing House, and when I quote William Greathouse and Purkiser, these are now somehow NOT normative for Nazarene theology just because you say so??? Huh???? That's like saying the Pope doesn't speak for Catholics. I think maybe YOU should read your own church's literature on this, THEN come back to me.

I understand that you may have a beef with the Nazarene church, that comes out pretty strong in your writing, and I'm OK with that.  I just think that if you take a look at the doctrine for what it actually is, not what you think it is you won't be so quick to think that every Nazarene on the planet sees themselves as perfect. 
I believe

Mark here}   It doesn't matter worth a rats ass what YOU believe. YOU are not your church. I quoted from Nazarene Publishing House etc, and I think they speak for the church more than you do.

that sanctification reconciles you with God (that is a scriptural truth, not a doctrine), and therefore make you pure ONLY THROUGH THE BLOOD OF CHRIST.  I know thousands of Nazarenes, and I don't know a single one that sees himself/herself as perfect.  I am sorry you have been led to believe that.  I'd be shocked if you actually took the time to research this further, but you never know.  Until then, I hope you take this for what it is.  I am not trying to "win your soul", or say the Nazarene church is perfect, I just think that holiness is misunderstood by a lot of people when it doesn't have to be.  

Without wax,



M Landen 3-11-03


Date: 3/11/03 2:37:38 PM Pacific Standard Time
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Hey, in response to your article, "Entire Sanctification=Entire Nonsense", I just thought you might be interested to see more of the Nazarene doctrine (also, straight from the Nazarene website).  To cut and paste as you did in your article allows the same kind interpretation as cutting and pasting scripture.  Looking at it as a whole changes meaning. 



Mark here}   
Hey to you too- how are things down at Trevecca??? I had a friend who went to college there.

In answer to your (implied) accusation above that I took things out of context (your "cut and paste" comment), maybe you'd like to give evidence to your accusation that I took my quotes from NAZARENE books written by NAZARENE scholars out of context, rather than just spout off??? Once again, for the BILLIONTH time, a Christian confuses himself with his god, thinking that he can just SAY something (with nothing to back it up) and presto-chango "ex nihlo" it becomes FACT. Can you therefore, since you are NOT Biblegod, back up your charge with some EVIDENCE I took ANYthing out of context in those books???

No, of course not- you can't do that, for you've never even READ the books, have you? For if you HAD read the books, you would have known that the quotes I used were in no wise out of context. Again, it's easier to make IGNORANT knee-jerk responses than to sit down, crack open a book, and do some actual REAL research.

As to what THOSE Nazarene scholars contradicting maybe what OTHER Nazarene scholars have said, welcome to the wonderful world of "Christians Just Can't Stop Arguing Amongst Themselves"- what else is new? The Apostles used to argue amongst themselves all the time and the tradition just grew from there.

Until the OFFICIAL Nazarene governing body officially denounces the books (published by the OFFICIAL "Nazarene Publishing House") and scholars in question, I and everyone else with a BRAIN will keep on quoting from these books and scholars. Sorry!  And your long-winded quote (see below) from the Nazarat web page IN NO WISE changes what Nazarene scholars Dr. Greathouse and Dr. Purkiser said in their books published by the Nazarene church.



V. Sin, Original and Personal

5. We believe that sin came into the world through the disobedience of our first parents, and death by sin. We believe that sin is of two kinds: original sin or depravity, and actual or personal sin.

5.1. We believe that original sin, or depravity, is that corruption of the nature of all the offspring of Adam by reason of which everyone is very far gone from original righteousness or the pure state of our first parents at the time of their creation, is averse to God, is without spiritual life, and inclined to evil, and that continually. We further believe that original sin continues to exist with the new life of the regenerate, until [eradicated] the heart is fully cleansed by the baptism with the Holy Spirit.2


Mark here} You know, with such pompous claims as these, you'd think the Nazarenes would have done studies and polls to document that Nazarenes are by far the most moral and well-adjusted folks on the planet. After all, IF what they are claiming is TRUE,  THEN Nazarenes would far outshine the rest of mankind in righteousness. I'm willing to go out on a limb here, and guess the reason such studies have never made the light of day is that THEY WOULD SHOW JUST THE OPPOSITE- they would show that Nazarenes are NO BETTER than other peoples; in fact, it MAY even show they are WORSE. 

For further information on how Christianity doesn't always live up to its pompous claims, see my "Christianity Doesn't Work as Advertised" essay at: Morality


5.2. We believe that original sin differs from actual sin in that it constitutes an inherited propensity to actual sin for which no one is accountable until its divinely provided remedy is neglected or rejected.

5.3. We believe that actual or personal sin is a voluntary violation of a known law of God by a morally responsible person. It is therefore not to be confused with involuntary and inescapable shortcomings, infirmities, faults, mistakes, failures, or other deviations from a standard of perfect conduct that are the residual effects of the Fall. However, such innocent effects do not include attitudes or responses contrary to the spirit of Christ, which may properly be called sins of the spirit. We believe that personal sin is primarily and essentially a violation of the law of love; and that in relation to Christ sin may be defined as unbelief.

(Original sin: Genesis 3; 6:5; Job 15:14; Psalm 51:5; Jeremiah 17:9-10; Mark 7:21-23; Romans 1:18-25; 5:12-14; 7:1-8:9; 1 Corinthians 3:1-4; Galatians 5:16-25; 1 John 1:7-8)

(Personal sin: Matthew 22:36-40 {with 1 John 3:4}; John 8:34-36; 16:8-9; Romans 3:23; 6:15-23; 8:18-24; 14:23; 1 John 1:9-2:4; 3:7-10)

VI. Atonement2

6. We believe that Jesus Christ, by His sufferings, by the shedding of His own blood, and by His [meritorious] death on the Cross, made a full atonement for all human sin, and that this Atonement is the only ground of salvation, and that it is sufficient for every individual of Adam's race. The Atonement is graciously efficacious for the salvation of the irresponsible and for the children in innocency but is efficacious for the salvation of those who reach the age of responsibility only when they repent and believe.

Mark here} Regarding children reaching "the age of responsibility", it would THEN be better (according to Christian logic) to kill ALL children BEFORE they reach the age where MOST of them will REJECT Jesus, would it not???  See my essay "Abortion: The Christian Thing to Do" on my web page:  Abortion



(Isaiah 53:5-6, 11; Mark 10:45; Luke 24:46-48; John 1:29; 3:14-17; Acts 4:10-12; Romans 3:21-26; 4:17-25; 5:6-21; 1 Corinthians 6:20; 2 Corinthians 5:14-21; Galatians 1:3-4; 3:13-14; Colossians 1:19-23; 1 Timothy 2:3-6; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 2:9; 9:11-14; 13:12; 1 Peter 1:18-21; 2:19-25; 1 John 2:1-2)

VII. [Free Agency] Prevenient Grace2

7. We believe that the human race's creation in Godlikeness included ability to choose between right and wrong, and that thus human beings were made morally responsible; that through the fall of Adam they became depraved so that they cannot now turn and prepare themselves by their own natural strength and works to faith and calling upon God. But we also believe that the grace of God through Jesus Christ is freely bestowed upon all people, enabling all who will to turn from sin to righteousness, believe on Jesus Christ for pardon and cleansing from sin, and follow good works pleasing and acceptable in His sight.

We believe that all persons, though in the possession of the experience of regeneration and entire sanctification, may fall from grace and apostatize and, unless they repent of their sins, be hopelessly and eternally lost.

(Godlikeness and moral responsibility: Genesis 1:26-27; 2:16-17; Deuteronomy 28:1-2; 30:19; Joshua 24:15; Psalm 8:3-5; Isaiah 1:8-10; Jeremiah 31:29-30; Ezekiel 18:1-4; Micah 6:8; Romans 1:19-20; 2:1-16; 14:7-12; Galatians 6:7-8

Natural inability: Job 14:4; 15:14; Psalms 14:1-4; 51:5; John 3:6a; Romans 3:10-12; 5:12-14, 20a; 7:14-25

Free grace and works of faith: Ezekiel 18:25-26; John 1:12-13; 3:6b; Acts 5:31; Romans 5:6-8, 18; 6:15-16, 23; 10:6-8; 11:22; 1 Corinthians 2:9-14; 10:1-12; 2 Corinthians 5:18-19; Galatians 5:6; Ephesians 2:8-10; Philippians 2:12-13; Colossians 1:21-23; 2 Timothy 4:10a; Titus 2:11-14; Hebrews 2:1-3; 3:12-15; 6:4-6; 10:26-31; James 2:18-22; 2 Peter 1:10-11; 2:20-22)


2Constitutional changes adopted by the 2001 General Assembly are in the process of ratification by the district assemblies at the time of printing. Where changes are being made, words in italics are new words and words in brackets [] are words being deleted.

VIII. Repentance

8. We believe that repentance, which is a sincere and thorough change of the mind in regard to sin, involving a sense of personal guilt and a voluntary turning away from sin, is demanded of all who have by act or purpose become sinners against God. The Spirit of God gives to all who will repent the gracious help of penitence of heart and hope of mercy, that they may believe unto pardon and spiritual life.

(2 Chronicles 7:14; Psalms 32:5-6; 51:1-17; Isaiah 55:6-7; Jeremiah 3:12-14; Ezekiel 18:30-32; 33:14-16; Mark 1:14-15; Luke 3:1-14; 13:1-5; 18:9-14; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 17:30-31; 26:16-18; Romans 2:4; 2 Corinthians 7:8-11; 1 Thessalonians 1:9; 2 Peter 3:9)

IX. Justification, Regeneration, and Adoption

9. We believe that justification is the gracious and judicial act of God by which He grants full pardon of all guilt and complete release from the penalty of sins committed, and acceptance as righteous, to all who believe on Jesus Christ and receive Him as Lord and Savior.


Mark here} Ahhhh, the old "Blank Check" morality the Christians actually are brainless enough to BRAG about, rather than hide in shame over. The belief that no matter HOW bad, just a simple "I'm sorry!" wipes the slate clean as a baby's smile. Yes, old Adolf, a minute away from death, had only to utter the magic words "I'm sorry" and presto! He's no longer accountable for the actions of MURDERING millions and millions of people- can't be prosecuted by Biblegod, can't even be hated by his FELLOW Christians. Had some American Baptist or Nazarene soldiers  reached Adolf before he died, and had he made his "I'm sorry" to Biblegod, these soldiers would have had to HUG ADOLF HITLER as a fellow forgiven Christian, rather than blow his brains out. Yes, blank check morality- do whatever the hell you want, then cash in your "Get out of Jail Free" card whenever you want, over and over even. Jeesh! No WONDER Christians are less moral than us Atheists- they have no REASON to be moral.


10. We believe that regeneration, or the new birth, is that gracious work of God whereby the moral nature of the repentant believer is spiritually quickened and given a distinctively spiritual life, capable of faith, love, and obedience.

11. We believe that adoption is that gracious act of God by which the justified and regenerated believer is constituted a son of God.

12. We believe that justification, regeneration, and adoption are simultaneous in the experience of seekers after God and are obtained upon the condition of faith, preceded by repentance; and that to this work and state of grace the Holy Spirit bears witness.

(Luke 18:14; John 1:12-13; 3:3-8; 5:24; Acts 13:39; Romans 1:17; 3:21-26, 28; 4:5-9, 17-25; 5:1, 16-19; 6:4; 7:6; 8:1, 15-17; 1 Corinthians 1:30; 6:11; 2 Corinthians 5:17-21; Galatians 2:16-21; 3:1-14, 26; 4:4-7; Ephesians 1:6-7; 2:1, 4-5; Philippians 3:3-9; Colossians 2:13; Titus 3:4-7; 1 Peter 1:23; 1 John 1:9; 3:1-2, 9; 4:7; 5:1, 9-13, 18)

X. Entire Sanctification

13. We believe that entire sanctification is that act of God, subsequent to regeneration, by which believers are made free from original sin, or depravity, and brought into a state of entire devotement to God, and the holy obedience of love made perfect.

It is wrought by the baptism with the Holy Spirit, and comprehends in one experience the cleansing of the heart from sin and the abiding, indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit, empowering the believer for life and service.

Entire sanctification is provided by the blood of Jesus, is wrought instantaneously by faith, preceded by entire consecration; and to this work and state of grace the Holy Spirit bears witness.

This experience is also known by various terms representing its different phases, such as "Christian perfection," "perfect love," "heart purity," "the baptism with the Holy Spirit," "the fullness of the blessing," and "Christian holiness."

14. We believe that there is a marked distinction between a pure heart and a mature character. The former is obtained in an instant, the result of entire sanctification; the latter is the result of growth in grace.

We believe that the grace of entire sanctification includes the impulse to grow in grace. However, this impulse must be consciously nurtured, and careful attention given to the requisites and processes of spiritual development and improvement in Christlikeness of character and personality. Without such purposeful endeavor one's witness may be impaired and the grace itself frustrated and ultimately lost.

Mark here} Once again, a clear example of UN-clear Christian doubletalk. First they say the sanctified Christian has "Christian perfection". The word "perfect" as used in the New Testament comes from the Greek word "telios" which means, "having REACHED the goal, in need of nothing else". Given this definition, there would NOT BE any room to "grow in grace" for you'd already REACHED THE TOP- just as a helium balloon, once it reaches the ceiling, can't get any higher. Christian logic? Bah, humbug!!!





hatfield 8-11-03

Subj: entire sanctification 
Date: 8/11/03 12:57:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Sent from the Internet (Details)

Interestingly, I was surfing the net about this subject, and immediately before reading your article I actually read B.B. Warfield's article, which you alluded to with a quote at the end. I do not agree with this doctrine as is sometimes taught, and to use Warfield as a proponent of it is more than disingenuous, it is patently false. Warfield was writing AGAINST the doctirne, specifically stating that the "perfection" is to be obtained AT THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST, a hope for the future, not a promise for today.  To give part of the article in the fashion you did, without understanding where he was going with his argument is to lessen your credibility to anyone who has read this article or anyone who knows what Warfield and his colleagues at Princeton stood for. Again, I do not believe in "entire sanctification"  in this life as a promise of Christian perfection, and neither did Warfield. Pedantic scholarship on your part, indeed! Just as "Bible thumpers" with no real grounding in God's Word beat up others with their club, so you also seem to be ready and willing to hit the uninformed and/or unsuspecting with your misinformation missle of malice. Sir, forget what has you tangled up inside, and ask yourself this question: Do you know of anyone in history that is more worthy for you to follow than Jesus Christ? By all means do not follow yourself; if you (and I) have all these problems, how may we expect ourselves to deliver ourselves from this mess? You have to trust in something or someone, and as for me I will trust Jesus. Will you be able to stand before God and rely on your own righteousness? 


Mark here}   Mr. Hatfield here is absolutely correct about my having misquoted B.B. Warfield. Upon further reading, it does indeed turn out that B.B. taught this perfection was attainable only after death, and NOT in this life (as Nazarene's teach). I found the following quote from B.B. that clearly teaches this: 

"There is no promise of its completion in this life; there is no hint that it may be completed in this life. There is only everywhere strong exhortations to ceaseless effort; and strong encouragements by promises of its completion in the end against "that day." "That day" of judgment, that is, when God shall take account of all men and of all that is in man." 

I admit that I have made an error, and will change the website by removing the quote from B.B. Warfield (which is why if you are reading the website for the first time you won't find the quote there anymore). 

I would like to point out that, unlike the VAST majority of religious people, I am NOT married to one position "till death do us part". I am more than willing to change my mind if and when presented with adequate evidence, and what I have just done is further proof of this claim. I am for the truth, and not just some religious franchise. If by being loyal to the truth I piss off some Atheists (and I have done this before- just ask that quasi-Atheist Michael Shermer), so be it. And if I piss off some Christians, again, so be it.

My bottom line is what the Apostle Paul said:  Have I become your enemy by telling you the truth? I hope not. And now that I have proven MY honesty and loyalty to the truth, Mr. Hatfield, it is your turn to do likewise. In answer to your question if I know ANYbody in history that it is more worthy to follow than Jesus, the answer would be yes- lots of people in fact. You see, your Jesus was a FALSE PROPHET as evidenced by the FACT that he predicted that his Second Coming, judgment day, and the rapture, would all take place within the lifetime of those men and women living in 33 AD.  (for documentation of this, see my several articles on my web page regarding Jesus' false prophecies). So to answer your question- do I know anybody MORE worthy to follow than a FALSE LYING DECEIVED religious NUTCASE from 1st Century Israel? Yes I do- and so do you. Stop wasting your time following false prophets. It's not hard finding people more worthy than that false prophet Jesus.





Roy from New Zealand  12-5-03


Date: 12/5/03 4:18:39 AM !!!First Boot!!!


I quickly browsed through your article. Will read it thoroughly later. Just wanted you to know that I have been a Nazarene for over 30 years and also take issue with both some doctrinal issues as well as with the fact that I have been kicked in the teeth and disappointed more often than I can remember by my fellow Nazarenes. (Life can be rough no matter where you are or who you associate with!) Why then do I remain in the movement? Either I am a total moron, or in essence, the holiness movement does have hold of something real. (I believe we do) We may not all live up to it, but we do believe that the essence of true Christianity is entire devotement to God. For that we need to strive. You may believe that we have got it all wrong, (and we might) but those of us who believe we are honest with ourselves would like to believe that we will deal honestly with hypocricy in our own lives when it becomes apparrant to us. We obviously don't always see ,(or like to be told) that we fall short of our own ideals. Like most of humanity, we too may turn out to be cowards when faced with the truth about ourselves!

Mark here}   You sound like a breath of fresh air. I wish more Christians wouldn't be so adverse to taking an honest look at themselves and their religions.



By the way, I would definitly agree that some of our manual statements require adjustment. But I suspect that like any institution of some age and influence, these have become venerated over time and no one would dare to try and slay the sacred cow. There are some things in the manual that I simply ignore, because to try and uphold them would be to embarrass myself. It is not always easy to seperate the wheat from the chaff, and a clearer understanding of holiness requires a little more research than Greathouse, the manual and Purkiser. How about reading Wynkoop and a few others to get a broader picture? You just might come across something worthwhile. While I suspect there is no philosophy on earth that does not contain something to which someone will object, I do at the same time mean to suggest that we accept anything uncritically. All I am saying is that every human attempt to state the truth, is flawed. Some more fatal than others.

Mark here}   What you, and most other Christians as well are doing, is what I call "Smorgasbord Christianity", wherein one picks out what he likes, and leaves behind what he doesn't. Most Christians are not little robots controlled by their church leaders- and that's a good thing. For example, most American Catholics are not about to have 10 or 20 kids just because the pope wants it that way, nor are they going to abstain from sex done just for the pleasure of it. Common sense overrules religion in most people, and this keeps fanaticism down.



I have been thrashing holiness beliefs around for over 30 years now, and I am convinced that life does not arrive in a neat little box. (Especially religious life) Though it probably helps humanity to feel secure to have the answers to life all neatly worked out, life  is much more like a work of understanding in progress than it is a neatly packaged answer. There are I think, one or two fundamental "self-evidencing" truths about life. One is that most of us seem to believe (without having any tangible evidence to back it up) that our lives are of value. Where did we ever get that idea from? Of course we could always resort to the alternative and "Conjugate the verb and learn to eat successfully" In other words, "Eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die." Why should we care for any other human being on this planet? Who determined (and when) that a human life is worth anything? And if it isn't, then what is the point? Now if someone can help me  understand this little problem about life, I would be eternally grateful, because I tried the alternative, and it simply left me with far more perplexing questions than "who will untie the Gordian Knot?"

Mark here}   If to no one else in the whole universe, my life should have value to me. I would imagine also that this belief is missing in many people who end up killing themselves. Some beliefs benefit our survival (such as mankind's universal optimism that things will always get better) even though they are without foundation.



From the tone of your writing, I would venture to say that your beef goes far deeper than having something against the Nazarenes! You're convinced that Christ has no credibility at all. In fact you appear to be absolutely certain that he was a false prophet. The one thing you do not make clear though is to clearly state what you believe is the truth (if you indeed believe there is such a thing). In addition, your catchphrase "Set free" implies that you were once "not free". What made you "free?" And in what does your freedom now lie.? How and when was your mind awakened to your "truth?"

Mark here}   What is THE truth? There is no one single "truth".  2+2=4 is just one truth among billions. Truth is not, and never has been, a "person".  As for being Set Free, I was Set Free from 20 years of being a Christian thru intense Bible study, when I learned that Jesus had made false prophecies regarding his second coming. As a basically nice guy, I could not bring myself to continue to worship a false prophet- I drew the line there, and left.



Debate is a great thing. But so is reason, and respect. I find it disconcerting that you often resort to ridicule and argue with a demeaning "know-it-all" attitude. That is not the mark of mature, thoughtful, confident scholarship. Rather it suggests (to me at least) that you are motivated more by anger. I am not a psychologist, but your anger shows very clearly through your writing.

Mark here}   Righteous Anger has its place. Was not Jesus angry when he drove the money changers from the temple? Is not a mugging victim angry at his mugger? Is not a victim of a swindle angry at who lied to him? If you discovered that you've just wasted the past 20 years of your life in some cult that worshipped a false prophet, would you be angry, or happy??? I hope to high heaven that you'd be pissed- VERY pissed, and that you'd do everything you could to try and help others not make the same mistake.


Incidently, what exactly is your central belief about life? Let's talk about that.
PS. Would you care to comment on C. S. Lewis's statement that Jesus Christ was either a lunatic, a liar (that is obviously your position) or Lord of the universe?  (Or are there other alternatives to intentional deception, self-deception and the truth?)

Mark here}   I've seen whole essays on this topic. The main problem with Lewis' statement is that it's too simplistic- it assumes too many things. It assumes that Jesus really existed (some scholars doubt he did- they think he was made up to start a religion). It assumes he actually said everything the gospels claim he did (many scholars believe the gospels to be faulty). It also assumes the gospels are telling the truth about him walking on water etc. 

My own thoughts tend to lean towards Jesus just being another Middle-Eastern religious nut who eagerly wanted to die for his religion- just like the dozens of suicide bombers who every week blow themselves up over there in our own era. Jesus could have had a nice life, but instead he had to fuck it all up and get executed. I don't believe in the miracles, and I don't believe we have accurate records of what he said and did, and I do believe that alot of people back then who put this religion together were out and out liars and frauds- just like today's televangelists. People don't change all that much.



Bobby 12-27-03


Subject: response to essay
Date: 12/27/03 6:27:15 AM !!!First Boot!!!
To: JCnot4me



Essay Title:  Entire Sanctification = Entire Nonsense.

Comment on a statement you made.  
Your statement = "you must realize that Entire Sanctification teaches Christian Perfection, which means a sinless life; the total removal of not only sin, but even the ability to sin. In other words, a good Nazarene could not make a mistake, a sin, even if he tried! In fact, he couldn't even THINK a sinful thought."

I think that you need to understand that the doctrine of Entire Santification DOES NOT say that those who are entirely sanctified no longer have the ability to sin.  I am not sure where you got that idea. 

Mark here}   Gee... where on earth would I ever get such a crazy idea... I remember!  Let's start with the term itself: the phrase "ENTIRE Sanctification" implies that no part is to be left out of being sanctified, and sanctified means set apart for God's use, not sins' or Satan's, ergo 100% of the man who has experienced "entire sanctification" is sin free, i.e. perfect. Another clue is when Nazarene scholar Purkiser said that it does away with a life of sin. Another clue might be the phrase "sinless perfection", which historically has always been another way of saying "Entire Sanctification".



 But what you have written is false.  Those who are entirely sanctified DO have the ability to sin!

Mark here}   I agree with you- and I've seen it plenty! But what you're acknowledging is just that the THEORY doesn't jive with the REALITY. Welcome to Free Thinking.

In your essay you quoted W.T. Purkiser saying "...true justification in Christ does away with a life of sin."  

Notice that he never said "does away with the ability to sin" which is totally different. 

Mark here}   Excuse me, but the doctrine is not called "Sanctification" but rather ENTIRE Sanctification. What part of "entire" don't you understand? When Purkiser says a man's life of sin has been done away with, that can mean nothing else than he no longer sins. When an alcoholic says his life of drinking has been done away with, you would not expect to see him with a beer in his hand, WOULD YOU??? And if you DID see him with a beer, then obviously his life of drinking has NOT been done away with.

Are you Christians really so blind to the faults of your own doctrines that you are incapable of basic rational thought??? This shit is a no-brainer, how can you not see it???


 Here is a website that you can visit that answers questions concerning entire sanctification.  Notice question #12
This is the official website of the Wesleyan Church - Obviously a credible website

Looking forward to your reply,




Wild01Cat   1-1-04

Subject: entire sanctification
Date: 1/1/04 9:07:57 AM !!!First Boot!!!
To: JCnot4me


I just wanted to let you know that I recently read your article about entire sanctification and the Church of the Nazarene.  I am a licensed minister of the Church of the Nazarene and just wanted to let you in on what we hold sanctification to really be. 

First of all, know that I am in no position to tell anybody what to believe.  I believe the authority of scripture to be much more powerful than what humans believe the Word to be.  I am one of those Nazarenes that goes by what Scripture says and not the Manual.  However, as a licensed minister, I do have the responsibility to teach/preach what the Church believes.

Mark here}   And if you come to believe there's a contradiction between the two, what does a professional preacher do: be quiet and keep one's job, or speak up for the truth! (and get fired). Life would be easier if we were all born rich!

I also appreciate the way you actually do research on biblical/church doctrine.  There are not a lot of people who do that and just go by what the Manual says without learning it themselves.  For that, I applaud you.

Okay here we go.  Coming from the Greek world "telios," this perfection John Wesley and us Nazarenes refer to does not mean perfect in the sense of being without blemish or being faultless.  This "telios" perfection refers to completing your purpose.  An old, raggedy chair that is insanely ugly is still a perfect chair in this sense because it provides one with a place to sit.  In the same our "purpose" as humans to become like Christ. 

The Church of the Nazarene recognizes that there is no way humans can go a day without sin.  However, as we strive to be like Christ, which is our purpose, we are achieving that perfection.   This is why Dr. Greathouse refers to entire sanctification as "imperfect perfection."  We are perfect because we are striving to be like Christ, even though we will still sin along the journey. 

Mark here}   If it takes pulling out an electron microscope to see why "imperfect perfection" isn't what it sounds like- a load of crap- then it's time to change the verbiage. Yes, even Bill Clinton MAY have been right- TECHNICALLY- with his "is-is" speech, but to 99.999% of everyone else on the planet, we knew he was just playing verbal volleyball. The term "Imperfect perfection" is nonsense. It shouldn't be defended. It should be dumped.

As seen in the Manual of the Church of the Nazarene, we see sanctification as "being made free from original sin."  As human beings, we are naturally inclined to do evil because of the Fall.  Because of this, every single individual has struggles, weaknesses, and temptations.  They are born into us, or more like we are born into them.  When we are sanctified, these struggles, tempatations, and weaknesses are no longer struggles, temptations, and weaknesses.  We no longer have to face these evils because we have been made free from them.  However, even though we are made free from these, we are still going to screw up because after all, we are humans

Mark here}   Huh???  Does living in a Nazarene universe really re-rout the brain neurons to the point where you don't see in the above paragraph what is jumping out at me???

  • The Fall causes humans to sin.
  • Sanctification cures The Fall.
  • Therefore, humans who have been Sanctified (cured of The Fall) sin.

This makes as much sense as:

  • X Germs cause humans to get the X disease.
  • Shots of Penicillin  kill the X germs. 
  • Therefore, humans who have had Penicillin shots... get the X disease.

I believe in a cause and effect universe. If the CAUSE for something has been destroyed, then the EFFECT that resulted from that cause has likewise been destroyed.

If what CAUSES sin (the Fall) has been removed, then the EFFECT of the Fall (sin) has also been removed. So how in the world can you LOGICALLY end up with your above illogic???



So in conclusion, entire sanctification is not the doctrine that we no longer sin, but are able to be made Christ-like, which is our purpose in this life.

Mark here}   So... you are made to be "Christ-like"??? Just exactly was Christ like? Christ was without sin, never sinned, and never made a mistake (according to your Bible). Now let me ask you again: you are made to be "Christ-like"???   Would you like to rephrase that? Or better yet- dump the doctrine, and use something that doesn't need a 10,000 page explanation/justification of microtheology.

I hope this may help in your research as you continue to research Christianity.

God Bless



Jason Summers 2-25-04

Subj: Entire Sanctification
Date: 2/25/2004 2:56:59 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: JCnot4me

Hi, My name is Jason Summers. I'm currently a senior at Hobe Sound Christian Academy. For Bible class we are required to wright a paper on entire sanctification. The school I attend is of the Weslian Holiness denomination, although I'm non-denominational, I find myself agreeing with not every aspect of thier doctrine, but a lot of it.
The reason I'm wrighting you is because your information seems to be a little off and I don't think you portray thier paticular doctrine correctly. Entire Sanctification does not mean in any way that the individual cannot sin. It is simply a complete surrender to God and his will. One who experiences this is more likely not to sin than he who has a half hearted commitment to God.
The most important thing is the friut of thier doctrine. I genuinely see Christ through my "holiness" teachers. So they must be doing something right.
Hey man, God bless you, Jason Summers


Mark here}   Hey Jason, thanks for writing. And by the way, as long as you or your parents are paying good money for you to go to a private school, you might want to check with your teachers regarding spelling- or a refund at the least! I put some of your misspelled words in bold.

You said that ENTIRE sanctification is "does not mean...the individual cannot sin". But I ask you, why not call in PARTIAL sanctification then? YOUR religion is the one that claims ENTIRE, and ENTIRE in any dictionary means 100%, and a person who is 100% sanctified, i.e. holy and set apart for Biblegod, would not sin. You yourself said it is a "complete surrender to God and his will". Yet in reality you meant an IN-complete surrender, for you yourself admit that such a person is not perfect, just "more likely not to sin". Sounds more like Las Vegas odds that a sure theological stand, Jason!

As for you seeing Christ thru your teachers... your Christ must not be perfect then, for we both know your teachers are not.

Go back and think about it some more. Words have definitions already set up- we are not allowed to just make up our own.


Ebensburg5 10-14-04


Date: 10/14/2004 12:44:28 AM Pacific Standard Time
Reply To:
To: JCnot4me




Mark here}   To the contrary, that is EXACTLY what your own leaders and theologians have not only said, but even put into writing. Maybe you need to study the cult before you comment on the cult, for you appear to know very little about it.



Mark here}   Try it? Yeah, I tried your cult- for several years before I got suckered into another cult, the Church of Christ. I was saved in Nazarene churches AND camp meetings- several times! Sunday School, church service, Sunday evening service, Wednesday evening service. Yeah, I've tried your church. It's as phony as all the rest of them. You people think you're better than everybody else, and look down on not just the "unchurched" but on people of other churches as well. You people are Spiritual Snobs.




Marv Musgrave  9-2-05 

Subject: Nazarenes and Entire Sanctification
Date: 9/2/2005 11:45:04 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Reply To:
To: JCnot4me



After reading some of Oswald Chamber's works, I was reminded of the Nazarene doctrine of Entire Sanctification. I decided to read some more on the subject to see what current thinking might be. I ran across an article by you, circa 2002?, on the subject. Having grown up in the Church of the Nazarene, I am well acquainted with the doctrine. I attended Olivet Nazarene college one semester (Fall 1952) primarily with the goal of being able to attain that status in my life. Previous to that I had made trips to the altar only a few times attempting to become and stay a Christian. But that semester at Olivet, I concluded I couldn't do it. I still thought others did achieve the lofty status of sinless perfection, but I knew I could never measure up. I decided unless something happened in the future to change me or my situation, I would just have to be lost. Well, something did happen. A young man came into my life that showed me Scriptural passages I didn't ever remember hearing or seeing before. The emphasis on keeping rules and holy living was so strong in my church, I had never understood God's redemptive plan. I learned that Jesus actually died to save sinners and if I would place my trust in him, he had already paid the penalty for my sin and I could trust my soul solely to his keeping. I thoroughly understand the dilemma of thinking Nazarenes like Dr. Greathouse. They don't want to deny the Church's historical positions but they can't quite buy it either. So, they come up with double talk: "imperfect perfection", Isn't that what we now would call an oxymoron?

My heart goes out to those Nazarenes who have never been able to find rest in their Lord and practice what seems to me is self-deception. "I must be perfect to be saved, Therefore, I claim it by faith, even though down inside I know I still make 'mistakes' and 'short comings'. But, I don't ever sin." I cannot sin, therefore I don't.

On the subject of Entire Sanctification, I might accept the idea as a concept, an ultimate mark to keep us aimed in the right direction. Maybe the "high calling in Christ Jesus" that Paul talked about but said he had not yet achieved. It seems axiomatic that anyone who believes they have achieved it have, by definition, proven they haven't. It is kind of like humility. Once you think you have it, you've lost it.

Marv Musgrave


Mark Smith  here}       Thanks for the email. The doctrine does put Nazarenes in a bind. What has surprised me is the number of young Nazarenes nowadays who seem to be totally unaware that their church even teaches this! I guess taking naps during sermons might be the popular thing to do now.



 Gina 11-11-05 

Subject: response to article
Date: 11/11/2005 6:17:49 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Reply To:



Hi Mark,
You certainly have a knack for research, or should I say "gift". I thought I would write a short response to what I read on your website. I am a "Nazarene" church member. I didn't grow up in a Christian home, but was always hungry for "something". When I did become a Christian as a teenager, my life and perspective changed. I felt I finally had a purpose and a meaning. The funny thing is I actually have a biblical degree from Lancaster Bible College in PA and was attending a Methodist church when I went through an unexpected and horrific divorce. The church I was attending actually asked me to step down as youth director and from the board despite who was at "fault" for the divorce. I had 2 children 4years and 6 months when "He" left and the local Nazarene church found out about my situation through a friend and started "reaching" out to me. They heard my fridge broke and I lost all of my food and sent someone to fix that and provided meals and helped me with childcare, yard work, etc. It was SO hard for me to accept this help and from a denomination I heard had "cult-like" doctrine. They didn't want anything in return they just showed "Jesus" to me through their actions, acceptance and love. I cautiously started visiting the church and the people were so friendly and "real". I didn't feel brainwashed or trapped just loved. That was 10 years ago and I am still going there.

Mark Smith  here}       You know, you've committed the sin of what all Christians accuse me of, but in a twisted way. But I'll phrase it this way:  IF it is wrong for someone to LEAVE a church based upon emotional reasons, THEN it should be just as wrong to join a church for emotional reasons. What if Rev. Jim Jones' group had been nice to you? What if some Satanist group had fixed your fridge AND painted your house- would you be worshipping Satan now???


The pastor knows I don't agree wholeheartedly with all of the doctrine but accepts me, past and all. They have even allowed me to teach, perform solos, lead musicals anything I feel God has gifted me to do. Not once has it been said that we are "sinless".

Mark Smith  here}       That's part of the problem. Many church members have never even heard of the doctrine, as it's sort of being swept under the rug these days. But it's still there in the church manual and in its history. Yes, the church is EVOLVING away from it, but in no wise has it come out and renounced it.

We all sin and fall short everyday, that's human. The difference is, we are aware of it, convicted and have an obligation to confess and ask forgiveness. Willful disobedience is another story. I am only writing all of this to relay my message. Not every Christian that is a member of any Christian church believes every piece of doctrine at the church they attend. But, I found Christ through His body of believers at this particular church in a BIG way. Our pastor has lymphoma cancer and was given 48 hours to live in March of this year. Thousands of people prayed for him across the country and circled his house asking for God to spare his life. Miraculously He did! This little answer has stirred our church to reach out to the community and do whatever is needed for the sake of christ.

Mark Smith  here}       But you know what? If he had keeled over dead instead, your church would STILL be out doing its thing for Jesus. Christians have a way of taking whatever evidence they get and bending it to fit their goals.

Not to bring people to our church, that is never our goal, but to show love. We've been studying Rick Warren's purpose driven church and life books. There is no greater joy than to serve another person without expecting anything in return. Just like in the upper room when Jesus "washed their feet" even when they didn't feel worthy, because EVERYONE is. Don't think I am in a little bubble, because I am not. My family still doesn't attend church and I am well aware of everything around me, but I am saddened by so many walking aimlessly around without a purpose and so much anger. Thanks for giving me a chance to respond.




Brenda Jackson 11-28-05 

Subject: Hi Mark
Date: 11/28/2005 4:55:19 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
Reply To:
To: JCnot4me


I did a search today on entire sanctification and came across your stuff.

I agree with a lot of what you say. Entire means entire, and it has to mean that a Christian is not sinning. It is the only way that scripture makes any sense and well done for seeing the hypocrisy in the church. Christ died so that we can live without sin...totally. E-mail me if you want to discuss more

Brenda Jackson (Quaker)






Brenda Jackson 11-28-05  (Round Two) 


Perfection is what true Christianity is all about. But the church does not see it. That's because they are not willing to give up ALL of their sins. And what is the point if God cannot help us with our biggest problem ie sin which is caused through living in a sin filled world, although we are born innocent (I do not accept that we have to suffer for Adam) and having had emotional damage done to us from our parents onwards. We are damaged so we cannot love properly. God can fix this problem easily as He just has to heal the damage to the soul. All of the promises are for this life not the next (I'm not sure I believe in a physical resurrection. Jesus did not have a solid body). Once one is willing to give up all rights to ourselves and submit fully to God and accept anything that he does with us in the future then He can deliver from sin totally. It usually happens somewhere along the line when we find out just how corrupted we are and how even our most selfless act is full of self actually and how much pride we have.

So the church twists and turns and tries to make perfection into something that looks like it, but is not. Read 1John. Whosoever sins is of the devil. Period. But the church has to make this into something else like habitual sin. Wrong. The scripture means what it says simply and strightforwardly. If we are in Christ we do not sin and I have not found any one person today who claims this. But there were some in the past like Wesley and George Fox wgho started the Quakers with this doctrine.

So Mark you are absolutely right. The question is now, what about me? Am I without sin?

Once you are in the state of entire sanctification you do not sin. Not at all. Never. If you do you fall from that state and you are not saved, not justified and not sanctified and therefore outside of Christ. And you can fall from that state. Read Hebrews. I walked in that state for 18 months and did not sin at all not even in my mind. But I have fallen and I am trying to get back again but it is hard and I don't know how to do it.

Mark Smith  here}       Let me see if I grasp the logic here...

A)  Sin results in falling.
B)  Sanctified Christians are incapable of sin.
C)  Therefore, sanctified Christians are incapable of falling.

a)  Sin results in falling.
b)  You got sanctified, which made you incapable of sinning.
c)  Therefore, you became incapable of sinning and thus incapable of falling.

1)  But you DID fall.
2)  Falling is the result of sinning
3)  Therefore, you sinned.

1.)  You were sanctified yet you sinned anyway.
2.)  Sanctified Christians are incapable of sin.
3.)  Therefore...  I'm confused.

I'm having a problem with this:  You said that being sanctified made it impossible for you to sin, yet you yourself sinned; something which you said was impossible.

Am I going crazy, or have the inmates taken over  the asylum???


 I wish I was there now so i could tell you that I am without sin. I know that I am not in that state because when you are in that state it is as easy as anything not to sin. Beause God does something to our nature, it is crucified and is out of action. When I was like that I just praised God all day long and was in constant prayer to Him . I had a feeling of being alive that i had never known before. It was truly amazing. I cannot tell you how wonderful it was. It was eternal life.

Unless we are in this state we are walking in darkness as I am now. You have just seen Christians walking in darkness and that is why you don't get your questions answered and poor fools do not know they are in darkness and they do not listen to me or did not rather when I was preaching the gospel.






Earl Robertson  1-11-06 

In a message dated 1/11/2006 12:55:26 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, writes:
It seems as if you have selected the Church of the Nazarene for some
interesting comments. What contact have you had with the Church of the

Earl Robertson


Mark Smith  here}       I spent every summer as a kid going to the Church of the Nazarene, including summer bible camps and prayer meetings, as my father has been a Nazarene since the early 60's.





Earl Robertson 1-13-06 

Subject: Re: Question
Date: 1/13/2006 10:12:37 A.M. Pacific Standard Time

I appreciate your quick reply. A couple more questions, please for now. What part of the country did you grow up in and why just the summers going to the Church of the Nazarene? Also, the verse you quoted is interesting, I would like to respond to it. You have not become an enemy because of your perspective.


Mark Smith  here}       Bach when I was a kid, I used to attend a Church of the Nazarene in the Eastern Michigan District of the denomination, which included the summer Bible camp in Howell, Michigan. I attended the camp  back when it was just a large circus tent with a sawdust floor, and also after they built a permanent tabernacle. I've seen old farts doing cartwheels down the aisle, women spazzing out in public, and grown men blubbering in public worse than little babies. I swam in the lake back when they had separate times for boys and girls.

WHY in Michigan and WHY just the summers? Because that's where I would spend the summers as a kid.



Michelle 3/20/2007


To JCnot4me,

I stumbled upon your web page while researching something about the
Nazarene denomination. Your web page, I'm sorry to say, was simply
ridiculous! I've been a Nazarene for 43 years (all my life!), went to a
Nazarene college, married a Nazarene whose grandfather was a Nazarene
minister, and have NEVER, EVER, NEVER, EVER been told that 'Entire
Sanctification' meant I would be perfect or incapable of sinning! Good
grief! If that were true, the denomination would have collapsed ages ago.
You have CLEARLY misunderstood what you've heard and/or read regarding
the Nazarene belief of entire sanctification!!

Mark Smith  here}       Gee, how did you manage to miss THIS doctrine when it is so clearly a basic part of your religion? Were you paying attention in Sunday School, or where you doing something more useful like reading comic books??? I quoted from Dr. Greathouse who was the General Superintendent of your entire church. You pretending ignorance of what he says is like a Catholic claiming to not have heard the pope discussing religion. How could you be such a "great" Nazarene and be so uninformed????

This is the best way I've heard salvation and 'entire sanctification'

You are SAVED when you recognize you have sinned and ask Jesus Christ,
who took all our sins on himself the day he died on the cross, to forgive
you. At that point, you have EVERYTHING that Jesus/God has to give: Love,
grace, mercy, forgiveness, a hope & a future with Him, etc. etc.
Essentially, you have ALL of HIM!

Mark Smith  here}       You yourself show signs of Nazarene doublethink. You state above that at salvation one has EVERYTHING that your gods have to offer. Yet your very next paragraph (see below) contradicts what you just wrote, as there is even MORE to be had!!! So which is it: upon being saved one has or does NOT have EVERYTHING??? Why, you are of the faith of "imperfect perfection" so why should I expect a rational answer from you???

ENTIRE SANCTIFICATION comes when you allow God's Holy Spirit to live
inside you after you've been 'saved' or forgiven.
He cleaned out all the
yucky junk in your heart when you asked Him to forgive you, and now your
heart is ready for Him and you're VERY WILLING to live the way God wants
you to. No more sinning ON PURPOSE. The way Jesus lived when he lived on
Being obedient to the Father. Studying His Word. Praying. Helping
the sick & the needy. Spreading the Good News. Simply put: God now has

Mark Smith  here}       Again, the mental gymnastics! What you wrote above (in blue) about being as perfect as Jesus was, is 100% against what you wrote below (in blue) where you admit you'll screw up. Of COURSE   YOU   see nothing wrong with the concept of "imperfect perfection". Your brain is already clearly beyond being rational, you, you, you... NAZARENE!!!!

BUT....He didn't wave a magic wand and make you into a perfect person
that won't ever make a mistake, because you will.
BUT... you no longer
WANT to do anything that would cause Him to grieve, which is what sin
does. God's Spirit lives in you, so when you do something that is wrong,
you'll know it in a heartbeat!! So you confess it, it's forgiven, life is
good again, and you go on with your life, trying your best not to screw
up again! The difference between the YOU now and the YOU then is that you
RECOGNIZE sin for what it is; you don't WANT to sin; and you work really
hard NOT to sin. NO PEFECTION INVOVLED!!!!! Just an obedient

So there is the Nazarene doctrine in a nutshell. Feel free to e-mail me
if you have any questions.




Mack D. Hewitt  9/26/07


Just a few lines in response to your diatribe against the doctrine of entire sanctification in general and Nazarenes in particular:


You repeatedly state that entire sanctification means having even the ability to sin taken away.  Actually, that is not now, nor has it ever been the position of the Church of the Nazarene.  Rather, entire sanctification is that state subsequent to regeneration in which the sanctified person is empowered to live closely enough to God that he would not willfully do anything to displease Him.  The question is not “Do I never sin?”  The question is “Is God able to keep me from sin?”


Sanctification is like a marriage covenant.  When I married my wife, my ability to be unfaithful to her was not taken away.  However, I made a sacred commitment to her to be faithful.  That commitment to her keeps me wanting to please only her.  Likewise when I received the baptism with the Holy Spirit – entire sanctification – I made a commitment to my Lord very much like my wedding vows.  That commitment keeps me consciously trying to please Him, and only Him.  Does that mean that I have never sinned or could never sin?  Again, I am not the pattern, God is.  Is God able to keep me from sinning?  Absolutely.


Mack D. Hewitt



Lindsay  11/2/07


Dear Sir,
I have looked at your website: it is ill informed and totally unfounded and full of inaccuracy.
May I suggest your website might be "Entire Nonsense"

Mark Smith  here}       Well, thank you for your well thought-out (for a Fundy) response. Next, you'll refute the entire theory of evolution with a 6 word quip. Good research.







Contact Information

Set Free!  Orange County, CA

Email:             Web Page

NOTICE:  Any and all emails sent to SET FREE become the property of SET FREE to be used or displayed upon the web site of SET FREE however SET FREE decides, but don't worry,  your email address will probably be deleted.   Views contained in SET FREE represent the views of the authors. No implicit approval by SET FREE is to be assumed.