Table of Contents
Stop Jailing Women For
Their Own Good
A Message from Eddie Tabash,
Attorney at Law, General Counsel to COYOTE, Los Angeles, California
Mr. Tabash can be reached at (213) 655-7506 or by e-mail at:
(From the Los Angeles Times, August 11, 1993)
Prostitution: Forbidding sale of sex by consenting adults
is paternalistic and condescending.
By EDWARD TABASH
The recent arrest and notoriety surrounding the alleged Hollywood Madam
brings to light one of the travesties that still blemishes our criminal-justice
system. Whatever one may think of prostitution, an argument can be made that the
sale by consenting adults of sex for money, per se, should not be a punishable
event in our legal system.
Religious-based arguments asserting the immorality of prostitution should be
given no legal credence. In a society that separates church and state, no person
should lose her or his freedom because of someone else's religious beliefs. Only
those actions that can be demonstrated by empirical evidence, independently of
religious dogma, to warrant criminal sanctions should be punished.
The paternalistic argument that women need to be protected from sexual
exploitation fails to justify the continued criminalization of prostitution.
This argument claims that in order to protect women against such exploitation,
society should imprison all women who engage in prostitution. This argument is
reducible to a claim that languishing behind bars is a preferable fate for a
woman as opposed to allowing her to freely sell her body, if this is what she
chooses to do.
A related argument is that prostitution should remain illegal, which means
women should still go to jail for engaging in it, because selling sex for money
demeans women. Thus, the advocates of this argument would prevent women from
being degraded by demeaning them even more severely by locking them up in a
prison cell. This has about as much logical force as imposing the death penalty
on someone for attempting to commit suicide.
The worst form of exploitation suffered by women who exchange sex for money
is from pimps. It is most often the pimp, and not the grateful, gratified and
happy customer, who abuses the woman. If prostitution were an unpunished act in
our legal system, women could generally conduct business on their own, without
having to rely on parasitic and abusive pimps.
An appropriately zoned, taxed and health-regulated legal prostitution
industry would free women from jail, free many of our precious few police
officers to focus on real crime and bring in much needed revenue. It would also
elevate society to a new and desirable plateau of live-and-let-live tolerance.
If anyone still harbors reservations about legalizing prostitution, perhaps
the question should be phrased: Should a person be imprisoned for no more than
selling or buying sex? Phrasing the question in such a way unveils the true
stakes involved in this type of issue. What kind of conduct should land a person
behind bars? What kind of conduct, regardless of what one may think of it,
should still be left to the individuals involved, without the intervention of
the police power of the state? When couched in terms of individual freedom, the
notion that prostitution, per se, should no longer be a punishable crime,
becomes a palatable and even quite civilized alternative to the present system.
If we, as a society, really care about women, we will not only provide them
with equal rights and opportunity, but we will stop turning some of them into
criminals merely because they have chosen to exchange sex for money. Women, who,
for whatever reason, choose to engage in prostitution, do not need to be
incarcerated for their own good.
The old argument of whether I would want my wife, daughter or sister to
become a prostitute has nothing to do with the fact that women who do become
prostitutes should not be thrown in jail.
Ideas that are commonplace today were once deemed radical. Today's
conventional religions were yesterday's far-out cults. The time has come to
Edward Tabash, a lawyer in Beverly Hills, has been active for more than 20
years in civil-liberties issues. He can be reached at (213) 655-7506 or by
e-mail at: firstname.lastname@example.org
This essay was originally from the following web page:
NOTICE: Any and all emails sent to SET FREE become the
property of SET FREE to be used or displayed upon the web site of
SET FREE however SET FREE decides, but don't worry, your email
address will probably be deleted. Views contained in SET FREE
represent the views of the authors. No implicit approval by SET FREE
is to be assumed.